Archives for posts with tag: art and life

I did get a lot done this year, just not the things I had planned to do. I know this because at the back of my desk diary I keep a list of priorities, goals, daydreams, aspirations and plans. Some of these are the low level bottom feeder kind of tasks, for example ‘learn how to use Excel’, so I don’t have to endure the humiliation of submitting my tax information in a Word document to my accountant. Others are more lofty, vague and ambitious like ‘have a son’.

On a list titled ‘2011 Goals: big and small’ which features twenty-two items, I managed to achieve exactly two things: I didn’t pay for parking at the University where I periodically work (I’m too miserable to buy parking vouchers and prefer a long walk into campus from an outlying car park. Faced with a choice between torrential rain, and paying $3.40 for a car space, I’ll always opt for a drenching). And I brought myself a nice pair of new trainers. Things I failed to achieve included: selling my house, the proper management of paperwork, finishing my crime novel and, something of a perennial favourite, getting rid of my gut!

On a list of thirty-two things I’d planned to do to my house, before selling it, I managed to achieve exactly (drum roll, please) five items. And that’s actually being generous with the point scores. The problem with the house (I like to blame the house) is that it’s one of those little 1960s fisherman’s shacks, originally a one room place, that later had a kitchen and bathroom added. I like rich colours, so when we first moved in, I made the mistake of painting the walls deep reds and greens. Unfortunately, being a small, square box of a house, it ended up looking like a Rubrick’s Cube. I’ve just finished painting everything white.

Then there’s a problem with my interior design sense, which could be kindly described as problematic. I prefer a style of home furnishings that lives comfortably with notions of kitsch, tack and overkill. Merging bordello themes (a penchant for furry blankets and velvety red and shiny gold fabrics) with a love of brightly coloured Indian and Asian Art, I effortlessly manage to create something that looks like the worst kind of Gentleman’s Club. Imagine some kind of colonial era bounder, staggering from one budget opium den to another, pausing for relaxation at a B grade antique shop, and you’ve got the picture.

'coastal'

I’m currently trying to emiliorate my own lack of taste by re-branding the place as ‘coastal’. This involves painting everything white and sticking stuff in wicker baskets (though why the f**k people do this is beyond me. The baskets are too small to hold anything useful, you can’t see what’s in them, and if you have too many of them you create this creepy Ali Baba and the Fourty Thieves feel). I’m picking up paint charts and going ‘mmnnnn, beige’. However just when the thought of all this beige got too much, I told myself that the house didn’t have to be ‘coastal’ it could be ‘coastal eccentric‘. This, I rationalised, would allow me the freedom to celebrate my own interior design excesses within a soothing cocoon of pale walls and floors.

So far the path to coastal eccentric has not run smoothly. I’ve found that the combination of a hot pink sari, casually thrown over a soft green leather sofa, just looks weird against a white wall. It seems as if the turquoise kitchen tiles that I so lovingly selected will tend to jump out, even against the calming influence of a beige backdrop. Then there’s this irresistable inclination to dot the bare expanses of white walls with LOTS of pictures. Frankly, it looks as if two different people live in the house and couldn’t decide what they liked.

Similarly my Arts career ran this year like it was being managed by a job sharing genius and idiot. For every resounding success there was an equally prattish custard-pie-in-face failure. The days the genius was on board, I managed to win just under $50k worth of grants, published a book and a journal article, participated in ten group art exhibitions, co-curated a successful touring artists’ books exhibition, published an article in an international art mag, and ran a couple of pretty cool community art projects. When the idiot took over, however, I couldn’t do a thing right. The list of knock backs, failed funding applications, refused opportunities, and politely phrased  rejection letters (ranging from the polite ‘oh, we just had so many great applicants’ to a hissy subtext of ‘are you kidding?’) was monumental. Unfortunately as if so often the case, as everyone tries to clear their desk before the holidays, most of these missives arrived just before Christmas, leaving me wondering why on earth the idiot had been rostered on at this important time of year.

It’s interesting to speculate how what you read effects what you do in your life, how you live, what you think. For me, books and conversations often trigger a whole new way of thinking about something; but quite often it takes some time for their impact to manifest itself in real life. I thought I’d briefly blog about books, current and recent past, that have had some kind of influence on my painting and/or life. I’m one of those people who either read a lot or not at all, right now I’m gorging- this tends to happen before a new series of paintings. (The last series of paintings owed a debt to Chloe Hoopers’s A child’s book of true crime and Carmel Bird’s Cape Grimm. Bird’s image of married, red-haired twins continues to haunt my imagination: they’ve got under my skin).

I’ve just finished reading Donna Meehan’s It’s no secret: the story of a stolen child. I interviewed Donna, a member of the Stolen Generations, as part of the 100 women book I was working on for the University of Newcastle, late last year. I was impressed by her and overwhelmed by the history that she represents. As a Mum, I’m still struggling to get my head around the fact that this happened to people in living memory. Interestingly, it was Carmel Bird who helped Meehan find a publisher for this, her first novel.

Donna Meehan's It's no secret: the story of a stolen child- http://www.boomerangbooks.com.au/bookImages/LARGE/949/9780091839949.jpg

I’m currently reading Angela Carter’s The Bloody Chamber and Contemporary fiction and the fairy tale, edited by Stephen Benson. My Aunty Pam recommended Carter’s book, and once I opened it I realised that I’ve already read it, maybe fifteen or twenty years ago. Certain phrases clanged in my memory: the mother’s ‘irreproachable’ bullet when she shoots her murderous son in law in the head; the key entering the lock of the secret chamber ‘like a hot knife through butter’; the visual image of the female horserider riding a horse at break neck speed along a shoreline, racing a flood tide; the bride’s husband closing her legs ‘like a book’. Benson’s book is handy because it includes an analysis of Carter’s re-telling of the Bluebeard tale, The Bloody Chamber, I hadn’t realised it was so controversial. Apparently she was working on a non-fiction study of the Marquis de Sade at the time she wrote Chamber, developing the idea of a moral pornographer, an oddly attractive concept but one that seems to disintegrate when you try and substantiate it via definition or example.

The Bloody Chamber by Angela Carter

I’m in the process of organising, with Newcastle artist Caelli Jo Booker, a group exhibition of artists’ books, to be held at the John Paynter Gallery, June 1026th 2011. The exhibition is titled Happily Ever After: alternative destinies in contemporary feminine narrative so I’m rapidly finding out more about the fairy tale genre. The John Paynter Gallery is part of the Lock Up, an old police station that houses a museum, artists residency and the Hunter Writers Centre. Alongside the gallery are cells (one padded) and a prisoner exercise yard, both of which are used as alternative exhibition spaces. Click here if you’d like more information about the exhibition.

Happily Ever After montage- Caelli Jo Booker

Before Meehan’s book, I skimmed The Fate of Place: a Philosophical History by Edward S. Casey, much of which went over my head: it seems that place is a much slipperier concept than I’d given it credit for. I’d written an article about the work of Helen Dunkerley, a Newcastle based ceramic artist, and needed to give my instinctive reading of her work some kind of definite theoretical basis. Not sure how that went. The closest I could come to it was Deleuze and Guattari’s idea of ‘smooth space’, a theory of nomadic travel, particularly how different this kind of movement is to the Western concept of a journey, with its defined beginning and destination, and specifically how nomadic travel involves a very different way of thinking about the trinity of place, self and space.

Dunkerley travels a lot, migrating between jobs in Newcastle, upstate New York and the Virgin Islands. I wanted to explore how each of these places marked her work, whether she was conscious of them doing so, and if she deliberately incorporated any local or regional references into her work. I got interested in her work, and the idea of place, when she told me about digging some red clay out of her host’s garden in the Virgin Islands. The clay was made into ceramic sculptures which she exhibited in Newcastle.

Prior to that, I re-read the Patrick O’Brian’s Aubrey/Maturin series, a collection of rather brilliant historical novels set during the Napoleonic Wars. I earlier blogged that my daughter was named after one of the British ships involved in these battles: The Sophie. Since then I have read O’Brian’s final unfinished novel, including a thoughtful introduction that identified which boats and naval actions were real, which were invented, and which were a combination of fact and fiction. I discovered The Sophie belonged to the latter category. So there you go: my daughter owes her name to a literary invention!